Framework for pediatric robotic surgery program development.

Pediatric robotic surgery has seen increasing implementation for its many benefits over the past two decades. As more pediatric surgeons gain exposure to robotic surgery, the interest in utilizing this technology is growing. However, there are no guidelines or existing framework for developing pediatric general surgery robotic programs. Programmatic development can be challenging, requiring institutional support, a minimum 12-month multistep process in partnership with the robot manufacturer, and organization of a local dedicated team. A cornerstone to all program building is collaboration and communication with key stakeholders who are committed to establishing a robotic surgery program. In this manuscript, we detail numerous best practices for implementation, followed by three variations of programmatic development, each drawing lessons from one of three practice settings: (i) A children's hospital in a large medical center associated with an adult hospital, (ii) a free-standing children's hospital, and (iii) a community-based practice. We aim for this article to provide a framework that can serve as a guide for those beginning this process, consolidating the key resources and strategies used to develop a robust pediatric robotic surgery program.

The Effect of Propofol on Peri-Induction Hemodynamics and Resuscitation in Operative Penetrating Trauma.

BACKGROUND: Hemorrhaging trauma patients may be disproportionately affected by choice of induction agent during rapid sequence intubation (RSI). Etomidate, ketamine, and propofol are safe in the trauma population-at-large but have not been assessed in patients with ongoing hemorrhage. We hypothesize that in hemorrhaging patients with penetrating injury, propofol deleteriously affects peri-induction hypotension compared to etomidate and ketamine. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study. Primary outcome was the effect of induction agent on peri-induction systolic blood pressure. Secondary outcomes were the incidence of peri-induction vasopressor use and quantity of peri-induction blood transfusion requirements. Linear multivariate regression modeling assessed the effect of induction agent on the variables of interest. RESULTS: 169 patients were included, 146 received propofol and 23 received etomidate or ketamine. Univariate analysis revealed no difference in peri-induction systolic blood pressure (P = .53), peri-induction vasopressor administration (P = .62), or transfusion requirements within the first hour after induction (PRBC P = .24, FFP P = .19, PLT P = .29). Choice of RSI agent did not independently predict peri-induction systolic blood pressure or blood product administration. Rather, only presenting shock index independently predicted peri-induction hypotension. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to directly assess the peri-induction effects of anesthetic induction agent choice in penetrating trauma patients undergoing emergent hemorrhage control surgery. Propofol does not appear to worsen peri-induction hypotension regardless of dose. Patient physiology is most predictive of peri-induction hypotension.

Distribution and Surgical Management of Visceral Ewing Sarcoma Among Children and Adolescents.

INTRODUCTION: Ewing sarcoma (EWS) is a highly malignant tumor of bone and soft tissue that occasionally arises from viscera. Visceral EWS (V-EWS) is challenging to manage given its varied organ distribution and often late-stage presentation. We aimed to characterize our institutional experience with V-EWS, focusing on its surgical management, and to compare V-EWS outcomes against those with osseous (O-EWS) and soft tissue EWS (ST-EWS). METHODS: Retrospective review of all EWS patients ≤21 years presenting to a single institution between 2000 and 2022. Patient- and disease-specific characteristics were compared. Overall and relapse-free survival were estimated using Kaplan Meier methods and log-rank test. RESULTS: 156 EWS patients were identified: 117 O-EWS, 20 ST-EWS, and 19 V-EWS. V-EWS arose in the kidney (n = 5), lung (n = 5), intestine (n = 2), esophagus (n = 1), liver (n = 1), pancreas (n = 1), adrenal gland (n = 1), vagina (n = 1), brain (n = 1), and spinal cord (n = 1). No significant demographic differences were detected between EWS groups. V-EWS was more frequently metastatic at presentation (63.2%; p = 0.005), yet no significant overall or relapse-free survival differences emerged between EWS groups, with similar follow-up intervals. While V-EWS required multiple unique operative strategies to gain primary control, no significant difference in treatment strategies appeared between groups. Surgery-only primary control was associated with improved overall and relapse-free survival in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: V-EWS presents unique management challenges in children and adolescents given its variable sites of origin. This large cohort is the first to describe the surgical management and outcomes of V-EWS, demonstrating more frequent metastatic presentation, while achieving similar survival across groups. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 2 - Cohort Study.

Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Repair at the Bedside or Operating Theater.

BACKGROUND: For critically ill congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) patients on high frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV), extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), and/or inhaled nitric oxide (iNO), operative repair in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) has been proposed to avoid complications during transport to an operating room (OR). This study compared neonates with CDH who received herniorrhaphy in the NICU or OR, with a subgroup analysis considering only patients supported with ECMO. METHODS: Patients admitted to the NICU in the first 2 weeks of life at a free-standing children's hospital between July 2004 and September 2021 were examined. Patients were categorized according to location of CDH repair, and impact on operative complications and survival was compared. RESULTS: 185 patients were admitted to the NICU with posterolateral CDH and received operative repair. 48 cases were operated on at the bedside in the NICU and 137 in the OR. Patients repaired in the NICU had higher use of HFOV, pulmonary vasodilators, and ECMO (all P < .001). Children repaired in the NICU experienced significantly higher in-hospital death and overall mortality (P < .001). However, in multivariate analysis, repair location was not a significant predictor of survival to discharge in patients receiving ECMO. No significant difference in surgical site infection was detected for operative location (P = .773). DISCUSSION: Congenital diaphragmatic hernia repair in the NICU occurred more frequently among higher risk patients who experienced worse survival. The rate of surgical site infection appeared similar overall and across subgroups suggesting adequate sterility and technique for bedside procedures, when necessary, despite restricted access to advanced operative equipment.